Who are the biggest Hyperliquid traders, and which known entities are they?

Rank Hyperliquid wallets on the leaderboard, then send their addresses to the batch label route; most top traders carry no entity label, and the batch says so per address.

Two calls. /v1/hyperliquid/leaderboard ranks wallets by realized PnL over a window, with account value, trade count, win rate and both cohort labels. A Hyperliquid account is an EVM address, so the same addresses go to POST /v1/onchain/labels/batch, which returns entity, wallet type, risk flag and 30-day flows for up to 100 addresses in one call, in input order. The parameters are on Leaderboard and Batch wallet labels.

Quick answer

cURL — leaderboard

# the five Hyperliquid wallets with the most realized PnL over 30 days
curl -H "X-API-Key: $VIKE_API_KEY" \
  "https://data.vike.io/v1/hyperliquid/leaderboard?window=30d&limit=5"

cURL — labels

# entity and wallet type of those five addresses on Ethereum
curl -X POST -H "X-API-Key: $VIKE_API_KEY" \
  "https://data.vike.io/v1/onchain/labels/batch?chain=ethereum&addresses=0xedcdcaa1f18350c50c10bef860e64daa9785d05a,0xfc667adba8d4837586078f4fdcdc29804337ca06,0x9321d8117e73b0c79035f0e87debcfd8dbb1d75a,0xecb63caa47c7c4e77f60f1ce858cf28dc2b82b00,0x051c2e6d49cf82ebc47f08f9b85800f94fc9693c"

Example response

Captured from the live API on 2026-10-24 at 17:17 UTC. The leaderboard rows are cut to eight fields and nextCursor is removed; the labels are cut to the first and fifth of five rows.

Leaderboard

{
  "traders": [
    {
      "wallet": "0xedcdcaa1f18350c50c10bef860e64daa9785d05a",
      "rank": 1,
      "account_value": 0.0,
      "total_realized_pnl": 9137753.568584997,
      "trade_count": 13,
      "win_rate": 0.3076923191547394,
      "size_cohort": "shrimp",
      "pnl_cohort": "3x smart"
    },
    {
      "wallet": "0xfc667adba8d4837586078f4fdcdc29804337ca06",
      "rank": 2,
      "account_value": 48749226.598805,
      "total_realized_pnl": 8456184.615246003,
      "trade_count": 426,
      "win_rate": 0.5375586748123169,
      "size_cohort": "4x whale",
      "pnl_cohort": "3x smart"
    },
    {
      "wallet": "0x9321d8117e73b0c79035f0e87debcfd8dbb1d75a",
      "rank": 3,
      "account_value": 8841.949682,
      "total_realized_pnl": 5618767.0968390005,
      "trade_count": 88,
      "win_rate": 0.46590909361839294,
      "size_cohort": "2x shrimp",
      "pnl_cohort": "3x rekt"
    },
    {
      "wallet": "0xecb63caa47c7c4e77f60f1ce858cf28dc2b82b00",
      "rank": 4,
      "account_value": 33067379.692377,
      "total_realized_pnl": 5567982.361969139,
      "trade_count": 3234,
      "win_rate": 0.6110080480575562,
      "size_cohort": "4x whale",
      "pnl_cohort": "3x smart"
    },
    {
      "wallet": "0x051c2e6d49cf82ebc47f08f9b85800f94fc9693c",
      "rank": 5,
      "account_value": 1199052.952251,
      "total_realized_pnl": 5486676.555443999,
      "trade_count": 18,
      "win_rate": 0.7222222089767456,
      "size_cohort": "whale",
      "pnl_cohort": "3x smart"
    }
  ],
  "totalCount": 173183
}

Labels

[
  {
    "wallet": "0xedcdcaa1f18350c50c10bef860e64daa9785d05a",
    "entity": null,
    "wallet_type": null,
    "confidence": null,
    "risk_flag": null,
    "net_30d_usd": null,
    "volume_30d_usd": null,
    "tx_30d": null,
    "tokens_30d_count": null,
    "found": false
  },
  {
    "entity": "",
    "wallet_type": "user",
    "confidence": "",
    "risk_flag": "",
    "net_30d_usd": -307068.635685,
    "volume_30d_usd": 406933.710025,
    "tx_30d": 77,
    "tokens_30d_count": 23,
    "wallet": "0x051c2e6d49cf82ebc47f08f9b85800f94fc9693c",
    "found": true
  }
]

The top five realized between $5.5M and $9.1M in the window. win_rate is a fraction, and rank 1 shows account_value: 0 because that wallet has moved its money out. On Ethereum, four of the five came back found: false with every field null: no label and no flow data. The fifth is a user with no entity name, $407k of volume and 77 transfers in 30 days. So none of the five is a known entity on Ethereum; on HyperEVM none of the five had a label at all.

Variations

Labels on HyperEVM. Labels are kept per chain; HyperEVM is where a Hyperliquid account also lives.

cURL — HyperEVM labels

# the same five addresses against the HyperEVM labels
curl -X POST -H "X-API-Key: $VIKE_API_KEY" \
  "https://data.vike.io/v1/onchain/labels/batch?chain=hyperevm&addresses=0xedcdcaa1f18350c50c10bef860e64daa9785d05a,0xfc667adba8d4837586078f4fdcdc29804337ca06,0x9321d8117e73b0c79035f0e87debcfd8dbb1d75a,0xecb63caa47c7c4e77f60f1ce858cf28dc2b82b00,0x051c2e6d49cf82ebc47f08f9b85800f94fc9693c"

The top 100 in one batch. The batch takes up to 100 addresses, so one leaderboard page of 100 fits one label call.

cURL — top 100

# just the addresses of the top 100, comma-joined, ready for the labels call
curl -s -H "X-API-Key: $VIKE_API_KEY" \
  "https://data.vike.io/v1/hyperliquid/leaderboard?window=30d&limit=100" \
  | jq -r '[.traders[].wallet] | join(",")'

Rank by size instead of PnL. "Biggest" can mean the largest accounts rather than the best 30 days.

cURL — largest accounts

# the 25 largest Hyperliquid accounts with closed trades in the window
curl -H "X-API-Key: $VIKE_API_KEY" \
  "https://data.vike.io/v1/hyperliquid/leaderboard?window=30d&sort=account_value&limit=25"

Who says so. For one labelled address, see which source claimed what.

cURL — provenance

# every source's claim about one wallet
curl -H "X-API-Key: $VIKE_API_KEY" \
  "https://data.vike.io/v1/onchain/labels/0x051c2e6d49cf82ebc47f08f9b85800f94fc9693c/provenance"

Before you rely on it

Most top traders carry no label

Labels name entities that are known on chain, such as exchanges, market makers and protocols. A private trader returns found: false with every field null, never 0, and that is the common case at the top of the leaderboard. The four 30-day flow fields are also null for an address with no label and for every bsc wallet. HyperEVM holds only a few hundred labelled wallets, so a miss there says little.

The window is what was realized in it

window=30d ranks the trades closed in the current UTC day and the 30 days before it, and a wallet needs 3 closed trades in it unless min_trades says otherwise. A wallet can top the board with a few large closes and an empty account, as rank 1 does here.

Ask your agent

Connected to the Vike MCP server (https://vike.io/mcp) in Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor, ask it in plain words. The hl_leaderboard tool (1 credit) ranks them and wallet_batch_labels (2 credits) labels them.

Ask your agent

Who are the top 5 Hyperliquid traders by 30-day realized PnL, and are any of them known entities?

Who are the biggest Hyperliquid traders, and which known entities are they?

Quick answer

Example response

Variations

Before you rely on it

Ask your agent

Related

On this page